On Saturday I attended the Digital Heritage 2014 conference organised by the Centre for Digital Heritage at York with an eye to both current and possible future projects in mind. I was struck by the multi-disciplinary nature of the Centre and hope that the current initiatives at Hull based around the Creative Economy can be as effective.
My personal take on some of the 15 papers presented:
Catherine Clarke (University of Southampton) delivered an excellent keynote highlighting her experiences in recreating medieval Chester and her current project on medieval Swansea bringing together a host of original sources to create engaging multi-media websites with elements for academic and public audiences. Both were funded through the AHRC (now why can't we do something like this for City of Culture in 2017!!).
Laura King and Jamie Stark (University of Leeds) asked us to consider the cultural value of digital engagement and whether the use of digital technology enhances or obscures access to the past.
Sanna Wicks (University of Birmingham) looked at the value of mobile apps and the preliminary results from her research won't surprise many - that the apps did lead to new information to be discovered, that most did generate a sense of engagement and enjoyment, that interactive maps were really popular and the over-riding conclusion that mobile interpretation can't be ignored.
Douglas Cawthorne (De Montford University) from the Digital Building Heritage Group demonstrated recent work with 3D scanning, using animation to bring to life reconstructions of buildings including the use of plans and drawings of buildings that were never physically built. (again very relevant to us given the thousands of plans and drawings held in the History Centre collections).
Mark Gibbs from Tullie House museum, Carlisle shared his experiences of gaming in museums and with working with the artist Adam Clarke to use Minecraft (something we are starting to explore using the Francis Johnson architectural collection - more on this hopefully in a few weeks!). (See an article on the Tullie house event)
Thursday 17 July 2014
Thursday 3 July 2014
Preserving FJ’s Files
If you have ever used archives will know that when you request
an item to look at it will usually be delivered conveniently packaged and
labelled. As you can imagine, most collections don’t come to us like
this. In the past we have had files deposited with us that have been tied
together with string, elastic bands, ribbon, and (weirdly) ladies tights
(hopefully clean!). We have had files covered with scrap paper, reused folders,
manila envelopes, and even plastic fruit and vegetable bags (not always clean!)
The process of transferring them from their original
coverings to archival quality packaging designed for long term storage is a
very important stage in processing collections. This is part of our
preservation work and is usually undertaken by the archivist whilst they are
cataloguing individual records.
Conservator’s Corner... ‘We use archival quality folders to protect the documents, as they are acid and lignin free. They are also chemically inert and they have an alkaline buffer which protects documents from pollutants in the air.’
Generally this is a fairly standard process of removing
potentially damaging coverings, recording any information on the original
wrappings in the catalogue description, and repackaging into nice new acid-free
folders.
Files as they came to us - wrapped in 'scrap' paper! |
However… once we got to the first file wrapped thus, it
was found that the ‘scrap paper’ was actually a plan and elevation drawing
relating to another project for which we also had a file. I hoped that this was
a copy of a drawing already included in the relevant file but this was not the
case. I checked a few more of the files and found a similar situation.
So we were then faced with a dilemma. We needed to unwrap
the files without damaging the tape covered wrappings and also find a way of
recording that there were additional plans, not part of the actual project
files. Part of the solution to this seemed to be to note in the catalogue
description that the file had originally been wrapped in a plan relating to
another project and to give a cross reference to the relevant project file (and
vice versa).
File wrapper before preservation treatment (plan and elevation drawing of cottages at Langton, North Yorkshire, for Lord Barnard) |
File wrapper after preservation treatment (plan and elevation drawing of Greenacre Cottage, Rudston nr Bridlington) |
So they needed conservation treatment to flatten, remove creases, clean surface dirt and remove tape where possible. This was a whole area of work that we had not planned for (pardon the pun!) and we didn’t really have the staff capacity to undertake such work. We decided we could only really do the bear minimum to make them accessible, so over the last few weeks we have started to flatten and surface clean the plans.
Conservator’s Corner… ‘We flatten creased paper by firstly putting them between papermakers’ felts and applying gentle weight. For badly creased papers this process is insufficient. In this case we apply gentle humidity to relax the paper before putting them under weights.’
And the effort has already been worth it. We have found
plan and elevation drawings relating to the Earl of Halifax’s estates at
Hanging Grimston, the Thornton Dale development for the Joseph Rowntree
Memorial Trust, and Somersby House for Lady Maitland. With this rudimentary
work we will be able to make these unexpected archives available to researchers
when the main project files become accessible at the end of the project.
Claire Weatherall
Project Archivist
Christine Brown
Conservation and Preservation Manager
Claire Weatherall
Project Archivist
Christine Brown
Conservation and Preservation Manager
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)